Blueberry
Marketed as indica. That label describes how it is sold, not its chemistry — the research is clear that it does not predict much.
Also sold as Berry Blue.
Across 673 laboratory results, Blueberry tested between 13.3% and 20.3% THC, with a median of 16.8%. Most sites print a single number here. The spread is the more useful fact.
Read this before the numbers
Generic name used by many breeders; lab rows keyed to plain 'blueberry' may pool several lines. Note the dataset ALSO carries a separate 'dj-short-blueberry' slug, so DJ Short Blueberry is a distinct entry here and must not be aliased into this one -- the build's collision detector refuses it.
Laboratory chemistry
Every figure is a median across real lab results, with the middle 80% of those results beside it. A wide range means the same name tested very differently batch to batch.
| Cannabinoid | Median | Middle 80% | Samples |
|---|---|---|---|
| THC | 16.8% | 13.3% to 20.3% | 673 / below typical |
| CBD | 0.11% | 0.04% to 0.50% | 187 / about typical |
| CBG | 0.32% | 0.21% to 1.18% | 648 / below typical |
| CBN | 0.00% | 0.00% to 0.08% | 149 / about typical |
| CBC | 0.03% | 0.00% to 0.10% | 184 / about typical |
| THCV | 0.00% | 0.00% to 0.17% | 96 / about typical |
| Terpene | Median | Middle 80% | Samples |
|---|---|---|---|
| Myrcene | 0.49% | 0.10% to 1.40% | 119 / above typical |
| Limonene | 0.08% | 0.02% to 0.29% | 119 / below typical |
| Caryophyllene | 0.22% | 0.07% to 0.60% | 119 / about typical |
| Terpinolene | 0.01% | 0.00% to 0.18% | 118 / about typical |
| Pinene | 0.20% | 0.04% to 0.57% | 119 / above typical |
| Linalool | 0.06% | 0.01% to 0.18% | 117 / about typical |
| Humulene | 0.08% | 0.02% to 0.17% | 118 / about typical |
| Ocimene | 0.04% | 0.00% to 0.39% | 119 / about typical |
| Bisabolol | 0.02% | 0.00% to 0.10% | 114 / below typical |
| Nerolidol | 0.01% | 0.00% to 0.12% | 119 / about typical |
Reported genetics
Afghani × Thai
disputed · bred by DJ Short
Breeder is not in dispute; the parentage is. DJ Short worked from a small 1970s-80s pool and has described the line differently across versions, and multiple released versions carry different genetics under one name.
Source: seedfinder.eu
What this page does not tell you
- Whether the jar in your hand matches these numbers. Strain names are not standardised, certified or regulated. Research has found samples sharing a name that were as chemically distant from each other as samples with different names.
- How it will make you feel. This site holds no effect data, because no source publishes per-strain effect rates under a licence that permits reuse. An empty column is better than a borrowed guess.
- Anything medical. These are measurements, not claims about what cannabis does to a condition.
Sources
Where two sources cover the same analyte, the figure above is pooled over their combined samples rather than averaged — a median of two medians is not a median. Each source's own sample count is shown in the table.
- Smith, Vergara, Keegan & Kane (2022), The phytochemical diversity of commercial Cannabis in the United States, PLOS ONE · lab · CC0-1.0
Compare Blueberry with others Find chemically similar strains
Similar means the terpene profile has the same shape, not that it will feel the same — what terpenes do to a person is not settled. The research on that.
Tried this one?
No one has reported on this strain yet. Yours would be the first. Effect data on this site comes entirely from people who used it, because no source of per-strain effect rates can be licensed at any price. Percentages appear once a strain has enough reports to be worth one.